Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 01_corpus:01_subcorpora [2020/04/16 11:34] – simone
+++ 01_corpus:01_subcorpora [2020/05/04 13:43] – simone
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
   * Each chat was to be assigned to only one language-sub-corpus.
   * Additionally, we differentiate between chats where we have demographic information for all participants and those where we do not. In the former case, the sub-corpus gets the extension _DEMOG.
-  * Where additional tasks were performed on individual chats (e.g. normalization or part-of-speech tagging) we created additional sub-corpora exist per language.
+  * Where additional tasks were performed on individual chats (e.g. normalization or part-of-speech tagging) we created additional sub-corpora per language.
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
   * WUS_SMALL_DEMOG: A subgroup thereof where we have demographic information from all communication partners.
   * WUSdemographics: Only demographic data per person. This sub-corpus is much faster if you want to look up demographic data only.
-  * WUS_ARGDROP and WUS_ARGDROP_language: Sub-corpora, for which argument drop has been manually annotated. For the architecture of the annotations and scientific considerations behind it see [[http://www.unige.ch/lettres/linge/syntaxe/journal/Volume11/11_Stuntebeck_2018.pdf|Stuntebeck, Franziska (2018): "Annotating Argument Drop in the Swiss WhatsApp Corpus". In: Generative Grammar in Geneva (GG@G) XI, 175-187.]]
+  * WUS_ARGDROP and WUS_ARGDROP_language: Sub-corpora for which argument drop has been manually annotated. For the architecture of the annotations and scientific considerations behind it see [[http://www.unige.ch/lettres/linge/syntaxe/journal/Volume11/11_Stuntebeck_2018.pdf|Stuntebeck, Franziska (2018): "Annotating Argument Drop in the Swiss WhatsApp Corpus". In: Generative Grammar in Geneva (GG@G) XI, 175-187.]]